Search



Not a CBA Member? Join Now!
Find A Lawyer Directory
STRATUM
Find A Lawyer Directory
Know Your Judge

TCL > March 2011 Issue > Court Business

The Colorado Lawyer
March 2011
Vol. 40, No. 3 [Page  95]

© 2011 The Colorado Lawyer and Colorado Bar Association. All Rights Reserved.

All material from The Colorado Lawyer provided via this World Wide Web server is copyrighted by the Colorado Bar Association. Before accessing any specific article, click here for disclaimer information.

From the Courts

Court Business

Visit the related Court’s website for complete text of rule changes or proposed rule changes issued by the Court. Each Court’s website includes corresponding forms, which are not printed in Court Business, and versions with highlights of revisions (deletions and additions). Material printed in Court Business appears as submitted by the Court and has not been edited by the staff of The Colorado Lawyer.


Colorado Supreme Court Rules Committee

Rule Change 2011(01)
Chapter 32. Colorado Appellate Rules
Rule 4.2. Interlocutory Appeals in Civil Cases
Adopted

(a) Discretionary Interlocutory Appeals. Upon certification by the trial court, or stipulation of all parties, the court of appeals may, in its discretion, allow an interlocutory appeal of an order in a civil action. This rule applies only to cases governed by C.R.S. 13-4-102.1.

(b) Grounds for Granting Interlocutory Appeal. Grounds for certifying and allowing an interlocutory appeal are:

(1) Where immediate review may promote a more orderly disposition or establish a final disposition of the litigation; and

(2) The order involves a controlling and unresolved question of law. For purposes of this rule, an "unresolved question of law" is a question that has not been resolved by the Colorado Supreme Court or determined in a published decision of the Colorado Court of Appeals, or a question of federal law that has not been resolved by the United States Supreme Court.

(c) Procedure in the Trial Court. The party seeking to appeal shall move for certification or submit a stipulation signed by all parties within fourteen days after the date of the order to be appealed, stating that the appeal is not being sought for purposes of delay. The trial court may, in its discretion, certify an order as immediately appealable, but if all parties stipulate, the trial court must forthwith certify the order. Denial of a motion for certification is not appealable.

(d) Procedure in the Appellate Court. If the trial court certifies an order for an interlocutory appeal, the party seeking an appeal shall file a petition to appeal with the clerk of the court of appeals with an advisory copy served on the clerk of the trial court within fourteen days of the date of the trial court’s certification.

(1) Docketing of Petition and Fees; Form of Papers. Upon the filing of a petition to appeal, appellant shall pay to the clerk of the court of appeals the applicable docket fee. All papers filed under this rule shall comply with C.A.R. 32.

(2) Number of Copies to be Filed and Served. An original and five copies of any petition or brief shall be filed. One set of supporting documents shall be filed. If the court grants the petition to appeal, the appellant shall file an additional five copies of supporting documents no later than the date on which any reply is due.

(3) Content of Papers and Service.

(A) The petition shall contain a caption that complies with C.A.R. 3(d)(1) and C.A.R. 32.

(B) To enable the court to determine whether the petition should be granted, the petition shall disclose in sufficient detail the following:

(i) The identities of all parties and their status in the proceeding below;

(ii) The order being appealed;

(iii) The reasons why immediate review may promote a more orderly disposition or establish a final disposition of the litigation and why the order involves a controlling and unresolved question of law;

(iv) The issues presented;

(v) The facts necessary to understand the issues presented;

(vi) Argument and points of authority explaining why the petition to appeal should be granted and why the relief requested should be granted; and

(vii) A list of supporting documents, or an explanation of why supporting documents are not available.

(C) The petition shall include the names, addresses, email addresses and telephone and fax numbers, if any, of all parties to the proceeding below; or, if a party is represented by counsel, the attorney’s name, address, email address and telephone and fax numbers.

(D) The petition shall be served upon each party and the court below.

(4) Supporting Documents. A petition shall be accompanied by a separate, indexed set of available supporting documents adequate to permit review. Some or all of the following documents may be necessary:

(A) The order being appealed;

(B) Documents and exhibits submitted in the proceeding below that are necessary for a complete understanding of the issues presented;

(C) A transcript of the proceeding leading to the order below.

(5) No Initial Response to Petition Allowed. Unless requested by the court of appeals, no response to the petition shall be filed prior to the court’s determination of whether to grant or deny the petition.

(6) Briefs. If the court grants the petition to appeal, the petition to appeal shall serve as appellant’s opening brief. The appellee shall file an answer brief and the appellant may file a reply brief according to a briefing schedule established by the court in its order granting the petition to appeal. The petition and briefs shall comply with the limitations on length contained in C.A.R. 28(g).

(7) Oral Argument. Oral argument is governed by C.A.R. 34.

(8) Petition for Rehearing. In all proceedings under this Rule 4.2, where the court of appeals has issued an opinion on the merits of the interlocutory appeal, a petition for rehearing may be filed in accordance with the provisions of C.A.R. 40.

(e) Stay of Trial Court Proceedings

(1) The filing of a petition under this rule does not stay any proceeding below or the running of any applicable time limit. If the appellant seeks temporary stay pending the court’s determination of whether to grant the petition to appeal, a stay ordinarily shall be sought in the first instance from the trial court. If a request for stay below is impracticable or not promptly ruled upon or is denied, the appellant may file a separate motion for temporary stay in the court of appeals supported by accompanying materials justifying the requested stay.

(2) An order granting the petition to appeal by the court of appeals automatically stays all proceedings below until final determination of the interlocutory appeal in the court of appeals unless the court, sua sponte, or upon motion lifts such stay in whole or in part.

(f) Effect of Failure to Seek or Denial of Interlocutory Review. Failure to seek or obtain interlocutory review shall not limit the scope of review upon an appeal from entry of the final judgment.

(g) Supreme Court Review. Denial of a petition to appeal is not subject to certiorari review. A decision of the court of appeals on the merits shall be subject to certiorari review. No provision of this rule limits the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under C.A.R. 21.

(h) All matters in the court of appeals under this rule shall be heard and determined by a special or regular division of three judges as assigned by the Chief Judge.

Adopted by the Court, en banc, January 13, 2011, effective immediately.

By the Court:

Nancy E. Rice
Justice, Colorado Supreme Court


Rule Change 2011(02)
Colorado Rules of Evidence
Rule 804. Hearsay Exceptions: Declarant Unavailable
Amended

(a) [No change]

(b) Hearsay exceptions. The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness:

(1) [No change]

(2) [No change]

(3) Statement against interest. A statement that:

(A) a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would have made only if the person believed it to be true because, when made, it was so contrary to the declarant’s proprietary or pecuniary interest or had so great a tendency to invalidate the declarant’s claim against someone else or to expose the declarant to civil or criminal liability; and

(B) is supported by corroborating circumstances that clearly indicate its trustworthiness, if it is offered in a criminal case as one that tends to expose the declarant to criminal liability. (Federal Rule Identical)

Committee Comment

The rule was revised, consistent with recent amendments to FRE 804(b)(3), only to clarify that corroborating circumstances are required regardless of whether a statement is offered to inculpate or exculpate an accused. See People v. Newton, 966 P.2d 563 (Colo.1998) (prosecutors seeking to admit statements against the accused must satisfy the corroboration requirement solely by reference to the circumstances surrounding its making).

(4) [No change]

(5) [No change]

Amended by the Court, en banc, January 13, 2011, effective immediately.

By the Court:

Nathan B. Coats
Justice, Colorado Supreme Court

© 2011 The Colorado Lawyer and Colorado Bar Association. All Rights Reserved. Material from The Colorado Lawyer provided via this World Wide Web server is protected by the copyright laws of the United States and may not be reproduced in any way or medium without permission. This material also is subject to the disclaimers at http://www.cobar.org/tcl/disclaimer.cfm?year=2011.


Back